What should a court reporter do to dispute a transcript error?

The best course of action for a court reporter when disputing a transcript error is to review audio recordings and verify the information with the involved parties. This approach is crucial because it allows the reporter to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the transcript. By consulting the original audio materials, the court reporter can compare the written transcript with the recorded dialogue, identifying any discrepancies.

Additionally, involving the involved parties, such as attorneys or witnesses, helps to clarify any misunderstandings and gather additional context. This collaborative verification process promotes accuracy and transparency in the transcription and upholds the standards expected in court reporting.

This method not only supports the credibility of the transcript but also helps maintain the reliability of the court record, which is essential in legal proceedings. In contrast, ignoring the error fails to address the issue, while merely consulting other court reporters or submitting the error to a judge without first verifying details would lack the necessary factual basis to effectively dispute the error.